This page contains selected disidentified statements and summaries from the Research Ethics Committee at the University of Oslo. The aim is to contribute to learning and consistent practices in research ethics cases and to provide insight into the case proceedings.
Statements
The following statements are the complete, disidentified statements in cases that have been handled by the Research Ethics Committee. They have been selected as they provide good examples of how specific research ethics questions were assessed, and/or because they include matters of principle.
Disidentification has been achieved by removing certain details and replacing them with descriptive terms in square brackets. The keywords represent the central themes considered in the cases but do not reveal the conclusions.
- 2022/40054: Change of Author Order, Supervisor Role, Criticism of Institutional Organisation (PDF)
- 2022/40488: The Review Process, Author Order, Relation to Colleagues, Criticism of Institutional Organisation (PDF)
- 2023/1559: Clarification of Co-authorship, Breach of Trust in International Collaboration (PDF)
- 2023/2046: Plagiarism of Ideas and Design, Communication, Conflict Management (PDF)
Summaries of Statements
The summaries below are not part of the respective cases but provide an overview of the outcome, themes, and issues that were addressed. The keywords represent the central themes considered in the cases but do not reveal the conclusions.
- 2018/13683: Clarification of Co-authorship, Duty to Publish
- 2019/4131: Plagiarism, Overlapping Projects, Clarification of Co-Authorship
- 2019/12601: Plagiarism, Minor Breach of Proper Citation Practices
- 2020/1000: Fabricated Data
- 2020/2273: Plagiarism of Ideas and Methods, the Supervisor Role
Contact
If you have questions about the statements and summaries, contact the committee's secretariat by email: