Pensum/l?ringskrav

 

B?ker

Asdal, Kristin 2011. Politikkens natur - naturens politikk. Universitetsforlaget.

Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes & Yannick Barthe 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Collins, Harry & Trevor Pinch (eds.) 1998. The Golem at Large: What You Should Know about Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fagerberg, Jan et al. (eds.) (2005): Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press.

Nelson, R. & Winter, S.  1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press.  Available in full text online (se Google scholar)

Skj?lsvold, Tomas Moe 2015. Vitenskap, teknologi og samfunn. En introduksjon til STS. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.

Sismondo, Sergio 2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Wiley-Blackwell (kap. 1-6; 9-10)

Tidd & Bessant (2013) Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 5th Edition. (kap. 1-2; 5-6; 9)

Turkle, Sherry 2012. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.

 

Kompendium (kj?pes i bokhandelen Akademika)

Akrich, Madeleine 1992. "The De-Scription of Technical Objects" i Bijker, Wiebe E. og John Law, Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 205-224.

Berg, Anne-Jorunn 1999. ”A gendered socio-technical construction: the smart house” i Donald MacKenzie og Judy Wajcman: The Social Shaping of Technology, Second Edition, Buckingham: Open University Press, s. 301-313.

Foucault, Michel. 2002. "Regjering" i Forelesninger om regjering og styringskunst. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk, s. 39-71.

Hilgartner, Stephen 2000. ?Staging authoritative reports? i Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford University Press, s. 42-70.

Latour, Bruno 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Engineers and Scientists through Society. “Introduction”, (s. 1-17), “Chapter 2”(s. 63-100) og “Chapter 3”, (s. 103-144).

Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar 1986 [1979]. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. “Chapter 2” (s. 43-90) og “Postscript” (s. 273-286).

Moser, Ingunn og Hilde Thygesen 2013. “Velferdsteknologi og teleomsorg: Nye idealer of former for omsorg”, i Tjora, Aksel og Line Melby (red.) Samhandling for helse. Gyldendal Akademisk, s. 144-158.

Oudshoorn, Nelly og Trevor Pinch 2003. “Introduction”, i Oudshoorn, Nelly & Trevor Pinch (red.) How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, s. 1-25.

Wyatt, Sally 2003: ?Non-Users also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-Users of the Internet”, i Oudshoorn, Nelly and Trevor Pinch, How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 67-79.

 

Digital tilgang (artikler)

Abernathy, William J. and Clark, Kim B. (1985): 'Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction', Research Policy, 14,pp 3-22.

Asdal, Kristin, Brita Brenna &Ingunn Moser 2001. Teknovitenskapelige kulturer. Spartacus. [Fronter]

Asdal, Kristin, Brita Brenna & Ingunn Moser 2007. “Introduction: A history of STS”, i Asdal, Brenna & Moser (red.) Technoscience. Oslo: Unipub, s. 7-53. [Fronter]

Balconi, Margherita, Brusoni, Stefano, and Orsenigo, Luigi (2010): 'In defence of the linear model: An essay', Research Policy, 39 (1),pp 1-13.

Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). ?Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.

Beaulieu, Anne  (2010). From Co-location to Co-presence: Shifts in the Use of Ethnography for the Study of Knowledge.Social Studies of Science, 40 (3): June. 453-470

Bergek, Anna, et al. (2008): 'Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis', Research Policy, 37 (3),pp 407-29.

Bijker, W.  2010. How is technology made? That is the question. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2010, 34, 63–76 (se WOS)

Callon, Michel 1986. "Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay", i Asdal, Brenna & Moser (red.) Technoscience. Oslo: Unipub, s. 57-78. [Fronter]

Castellacci, F. and Archibugi, D. (2008): “The technology-clubs: The Distribution of Knowledge Across Nations”, Research Policy, 37, 1659-1673. [Link]

Castellacci, F. (2008): “Technology clubs, technology gaps and growth trajectories”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19 (4): 301-314. [Link]

Castellacci, F., M. Gulbrandsen, J. Hildrum, I. Martinkenaite, E. Simensen & V. Tveito (2016). "How Does Innovation Differ across Business Functions? Employee-level Analysis of a Multinational Company," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20160321, TIK Centre, University of Oslo. https://ideas.repec.org/p/tik/inowpp/20160321.html

Coenen, L., Asheim, B., Bugge, M. M., & Herstad, S. J. (2016). Advancing regional innovation systems: What Does Evolutionary Economic Geography Bring To The Policy Table? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Online May 5, 2016.

Druglitr?, Tone 2012. ? skape en standard for velferd: Fors?ksdyr i norsk biovitenskap, 1953-1986. ?Introduksjon? (s.11-22) og ?Kap. 6: Kyndig stell? (s. 141-167). PhD-avhandling, TIK Senter for Teknologi, Innovasjon og Kultur, Universitetet i Oslo. [Fronter]

Druglitr?, Tone 2017. ?Skilled Care? and the Making of Good Science. Science, Technology and Human Values. OnlineFirst: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0162243916688093

Eisenhardt (1999): “Building Theories from Case Study Research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Oct., 1989), pp. 532-550.

Fagerberg, Jan (2003): 'Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature', Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13 (2),pp 125-59. Link

Felt, Ulrike og Maximilian Fochler  2013. “What science stories do: Rethinking the multiple consequences of intensified science communication” i Baranger, Patrick & Bernard Schiele (red) Science Communication Today. International perspectives, Issues and Strategies. Paris: CNRS Editions, s. 75-90. Fronter

Freeman, Christopher (1995): 'The 'National System of Innovation' in historical perspective', Camb. J. Econ., 19 (1),pp 5-24. Link

Freeman, C., & Perez, C. (1988). Structural Crisis of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour. In G. Dosi (Ed.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, pp. 38-66. London: Pinter.

Haraway, Donna 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. Routledge. “Chapter 1. Introduction: The persistence of vision”. Link

Hermansen, Erlend A. T. 2015. "I Will Write a Letter and Change the World: The Knowledge Base Kick-Starting Norway’s Rainforest Initiative", i Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 3 (2): 34-46.

Herstad, S., Sandven, T., & Ebersberger, B. (2015). Recruitment, knowledge integration and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 44(1), 138-153.

Hughes T., (1987), "The Evolution of Technological Systems", in Bijker et al. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, pp. 51 – 82.

Jensen, Casper Bruun 2005: “Citizen projects and consensus building at the Danish Board of Technology: on experiments in democracy”, i Acta Sociologica 48, s. 221-235. Link

Kannan-Narasimhan, R. (2014). “Organizational Ingenuity in Nascent Innovations: Gaining Resources and Legitimacy through Unconventional Actions”. Organization Studies, 35(4), 483-509.

Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175-98.

Kline, Stephen J. and Rosenberg, Nathan (1986): 'An Overview of Innovation', in Ralph Landau and Nathan Rosenberg (eds.), The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth (Washington, DC: National Academy Press),pp 275-305.

Kuhn, T.S. (1977) “The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery”, pp. 165-177, in Kuhn, T.S. The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Link

de Laet, Marianne & Annemarie Mol 2000. "The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology", i Asdal, Brenna & Moser (red.) Technoscience. Oslo: Unipub, s. 179-220.

Law, John (2007): ANT and material-semiotics

Law, John 2008. “Culling, Catastrophe and Collectivity”, i Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 9(1): 61-76. Link

Lezaun, J. 2011. “Bee, beekeepers and bureaucrats”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, URL:  http://iglp.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/Lezaun-_-bees-beekeepers-and-bureaucrats.pdf

Malerba, F., & Nelson, R. (2011). Learning and catching up in different sectoral systems: evidence from six industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1645-75.

Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967.

Marcus, George (1995) “Ethnography in/of the World System: the Emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24:95-117

Merton, R. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science. Science. New Series, Vol. 159, No. 3810 (Jan. 5, 1968), pp. 56-63 (se JSTOR)

Morlacchi, Piera and Nelson, Richard R. (2011): 'How medical practice evolves: Learning to treat failing hearts with an implantable device', Research Policy, 40 (4),pp 511-25.

Moser, Ingunn og Thygesen, Hilde 2014. “Prosjekteriets dilemma: Mellom avgrenset prosjekt og muligheter for l?ring i teleomsorg og velferdsinnovasjon”, i Tidsskrift for forskning i sygdom og samfund, 21, s. 57-75. Link

Murphy, M. 2004. “Immodest witnessing. The Epistemology of Vacinal Self-Examination in the US. Feminist Self-Help Movement”, Feminist Studies, 30(1), s.115-147. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3178561?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversity over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237-265.

OECD 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition.

Pinch, Trevor and Wiebe E. Bijker 1984. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other”, i Social Studies of Science 14 (3), s. 399-441. Link

Pols, Jeanette 2010. “The heart of the matter. About good nursing and telecare”, i Health Care Analysis18 (4): 374-388. Link

Rader, Karen 2004. “Why Mice?” i Making Mice:Standardizing animals for American Biomedical reearch, 1900-1955. Princeton University Press, s. 1-24. Link

Ruppert, Evelyn, 2013. “Not Just Another Database: The Transactions that Enact Young Offenders”. Computational Culture, pp. 1-13. http://research.gold.ac.uk/9630/

Ruppert, Evelyn, John Law, Mike Savage, Reassembling the Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices in Theory Culture and Society, 30 (4)pp. 22-46 (2013) 

Singleton, Vicky 2012. “When Contexts Meet: Feminism and Accountability in UK Cattle Farming”, i Science, Technology, & Human Values 37(4): 404-433. Link

Smith, K. (2000). Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinking the Role of Policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), 73-102.

Soneryd, Linda 2007. "Deliberations on the Unknown, the Unsensed, and the Unsayable? Public Protests and the Development of Third-Generation Mobile Phones in Sweden", i Science, Technology, & Human Values 32 (3): 287-314. Link

Teece, D.J. (1986). “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy,” Research Policy 15(6):285–305.

Teece. D.J. (2007), “Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 28:1319-1350.

Van de Ven & Poole (1990): “Methods for Studying Innovation Development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program”, Organization Science, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 313-335.

Venturini, Tomasso (2010): Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory.

Winner, Langdon 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109 (1) s. 121-136. Link

Wyatt, S. (2008): "Technological determinism is dead. Long live technological determinism", i The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3. utgave. MIT press, s. 165-180. Link

Wynne, Brian 1992. "Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science", i Public Understanding of Science 1(3), s. 281-304. Link

Wynne, Brian 2010. “Strange Weather, Again. Climate Science as Political Art”, i Theory, Culture & Society 27 (no. 2-3): 289-305. Link

Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O. A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2016). Related and unrelated variety as regional drivers of enterprise productivity and innovation: A multilevel study. Research Policy, 45(4), 844-856.

 

Anbefalt tilleggslitteratur

Beaulieu, Anne. 2004. “Mediating ethnography: objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the internet.” Social Epistemology, 18(2-3): 139-164.

Edwards, Paul 2010. A Vast Machine. Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. MIT Press. “Introduction”( s. xi-xxvii, link) og “Chapter 1: Thinking Globally” (s. 1-25)

Jasanoff, Sheila 2004. “The idiom of co-production”, in Jasanoff, Sheila (ed.) States of Knowledge. The co-production of science and social order. Routledge. Link

Murthy, Dhiraj. 2011. Emergent digital ethnographic methods for social research. In: Sharlene Hesse-Biber, ed. Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 158-179.

Wouters, Paul, Katie Vann, Andrea Scharnhorst, Matt Ratto, Iina Hellsten, Jenny Fry, and Anne Beaulieu. 2008. “Messy Shapes of Knowledge – STS Explores Informatization, New Media, and Academic Work.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Edward Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 319-353. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Pres

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Publisert 7. aug. 2017 15:00 - Sist endret 6. juli 2018 12:52